Lifecycle Cost Evaluation of Flexible Facility Designs

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to ascertain the type of facility design, standard, robust, or flexible, that yields the greatest lower lifecycle costs (LCC) savings to the USAF. To this aim, the researcher constructed a Monte Carlo simulation to determine the LCC for flexible, robust, and standard administrative facility designs for thousands of potential facility lifecycles. The simulation also illustrates the circumstances under which each type of design would result in the lowest LCC. The results of this research will show the USAF the importance of focusing on LCC and designing flexible facilities. Standard and robust designs are the staples of the current practice. This research found implementing flexible facility design into practice is advantageous to the United States Air Force (USAF) for two key reasons: (1) Flexible designs allows USAF facilities to easily adapt to changes in user demands and, (2) when compared to both standard and robust designs, flexible designs have LCC.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 24, 2016
Accession Number
AD1054081

Entities

People

  • Trevor P. Ellis

Organizations

  • Air Force Institute of Technology

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Engineered Resilient Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Accuracy
  • Air Force
  • Air Force Facilities
  • Civil Engineering
  • Cost Estimates
  • Data Science
  • Databases
  • Engineering
  • Information Science
  • Literature Surveys
  • Monte Carlo Method
  • Random Variables
  • Simulations
  • Standards
  • Statistics
  • Test And Evaluation
  • United States

Readers

  • Distributed Systems and Data Platform Development
  • Industrial Economics
  • Life Cycle Cost Analysis