Just Strike: A Commander's Guide to Preemptive Self-Defense

Abstract

The imminence requirement for preemption can make all the moral difference in deciding to launch a lethal strike. Influenced by Michael Walzers just war criteria for preemption, I provide three necessary conditions to strike first in self-defense. A commander must justifiably believe three things: that an unjust aggressor is poised to attack, that her capacity to avert an attack is constrained by an imminent decision point or last window of opportunity, and that preemption is part of a moral-risk proportionate strategy. In any event, a commander must decide to preempt or not preempt under conditions of uncertainty. As such, I incorporate and supplement Seth Lazars rights-based expected utility approach to lethal action.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 01, 2018
Accession Number
AD1059953

Entities

People

  • John D Huntsman

Organizations

  • Naval Postgraduate School

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Counter WMD
  • Cyber
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Human Systems
  • Space

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Aircrafts
  • California
  • Cyber Warfare
  • Defense Systems
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Information Operations
  • Intelligence Community (United States)
  • Intergovernmental Organizations
  • International Conflicts
  • International Law
  • International Organizations
  • International Relations
  • International Security
  • Military Science
  • National Politics
  • National Security
  • New York
  • Personnel Management
  • Psychology
  • Recreation
  • Second World War
  • Terrorism
  • Terrorists
  • United States
  • Warfare
  • Warning Systems

Readers

  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.
  • Strategic Security Studies