Automated Unfunded Requirement System (AURS)
Abstract
The 412 MXG unfunded requirement (UR) development and execution process had a stakeholder satisfaction rating of 2.9 out of the 5.0 goal. The mediocre rating was influence by the lack of efficiency of the manual process, which was creating equipment/service acquisition, disposal, and cost control issues. As a result, it delayed meeting customers expectations in replacing or upgrading equipment that are beyond their useful life cycle. This led to the end-users failing to acquiring and installing new equipment and disposing of old equipment in a timely manner. Additionally, end-users acquired equipment/services that had not been prioritized or approved by management in some cases. Moreover, acquisitions were made that did not meet end-users requirements because specifications were not validated, sustainment requirements were not addressed, and in one case, the equipment did not fit the location it was intended to be installed.
Document Details
- Document Type
- Technical Report
- Publication Date
- Sep 19, 2018
- Accession Number
- AD1061588
Entities
People
- Charles Ivory
- Cherisse Lawson
- Danilo Dijamco
- Gerald Lamb
- Greg Moten