Nonstrategic Nuclear Forces: Moving Beyond The 2018 Nuclear Posture Review

Abstract

The United States has a nuclear triad consisting of ballistic missile submarines, land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles, B-52 bombers, andB-2 bombers. At one time, it also had thousands of nonstrategic nuclear weapons (NSNWs) that were not covered by any treaties until the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty banned several types of US and Soviet weapons in 1987. Today, US NSNWs are limited to unguided bombs on non-stealthy short-range fighters at several bases in NATO countries. Russia, by contrast, has a much larger inventory of NSNWs and is modernizing them. China also has NSNWs, and North Korea either already poses, or soon will pose, a nuclear threat in the western Pacific. This growing asymmetry in NSNWs may pose a threat to NATO and to US allies in the western Pacific. The United States needs to devote more attention to this situation, considering improvements to its NSNWs along with other measures that might help mitigate these asymmetries, such as improved defenses against small nuclear attacks. The United States also needs to consider options for modifications to the INF Treaty in lieu of complete withdrawal.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Feb 01, 2019
Accession Number
AD1067056

Entities

People

  • Barry Hannah
  • Dennis Evans
  • Jonathan Schwalbe

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Arms Control Treaties
  • Ballistic Missiles
  • Explosives
  • Fighter Aircraft
  • Fire Control Systems
  • Guided Bombs
  • Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles
  • Intermediate Range Ballistic Missiles
  • Materials Science
  • Munitions
  • National Security
  • Prompt Global Strike
  • Rockets
  • Short Range Ballistic Missiles
  • Strategic Weapons
  • Theater Ballistic Missiles
  • Weapons Effects

Readers

  • Missile Defense Systems.
  • Plasma Physics / Magnetohydrodynamics
  • Strategic Security Studies