Hacking the Defense Innovation Ecosystem Enterprise: A Comparative Analysis

Abstract

Secretary Mattis 2018 National Defense Strategy acknowledges that the Department of Defenses (DoDs) asymmetric technological capabilities, which enable a decisive military advantage over U.S. adversaries, are steadily eroding. Implementing underutilized traditional and non-traditional acquisition authorities to navigate the innovation ecosystem may prove to be a fast, flexible solution to this technological innovation gap. We comparatively analyze the DoDs innovation ecosystem to understand the communities that make up the ecosystem and how they apply various acquisition authorities, techniques, or processes to accelerate future capabilities to the warfighter, and across the Defense Acquisition System. Our research shows that traditional and non-traditional micro-ecosystems play pivotal roles in the transition of cutting-edge technology through government, industry, and academic collaboration. Aside from traditional authorities, we highlight several non-traditional acquisition authorities with potential for broader adoption across the enterprise. Finally, we discuss lessons learned in terms of what, where, when, and how mid-level management decision makers can think and act entrepreneurially to positively disrupt status-quo bureaucracies that inhibit rapid innovation across the ecosystem.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Dec 01, 2018
Accession Number
AD1069574

Entities

People

  • Kyle J. Gagnon
  • Peter M. Van Remmen

Organizations

  • Naval Postgraduate School

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Autonomy
  • C4I
  • Cyber
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Human Systems
  • Space

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Acquisition
  • Air Force
  • Air Force Research Laboratories
  • Business Administration
  • Commerce
  • Department Of Defense
  • Disruptive Technology
  • Governments
  • Intellectual Property
  • Law
  • Lessons Learned
  • Military Acquisition
  • Military Research
  • National Security
  • Procurement
  • Public Policy
  • United States

Readers

  • Defense Acquisition Program Management
  • Defense Technology Research and Development.
  • Strategic Security Studies