Army Staff Doctrine Development toward Mission Command and the Decline in Staff Performance

Abstract

Army training evaluations of military staffs indicate these staffs struggle to perform the tasks necessary to fully support the commander. Despite the existence of doctrinal manuals, field training, and Army schools, battalion, brigade and division level staffs fail to control operations and support the commander's ability to make decisions. The question, therefore, is why are these staffs unprepared to perform the functions necessary to control operations and support decision making? Simultaneously, business management theories have articulated a clear role for managers in the execution of routine organizational operations and their duties in support of organizational leaders. The business world embraces the idea of managers and leaders, as analogs for the staff and commander, having different roles and functions. Henry Mintzberg and John Kotter have described those roles and hold that the roles of the manager and leader are distinct, separate and complementary. In all, nearly 30 Army doctrinal manuals on operations, and command and control, dating from 1938 to 2017, were evaluated to determine the role of the staff relative to the commander and the specific guidance to the staff officer on his routine responsibilities. This review revealed the Army's changing views of the staff and an increasing focus on the commander. It appears that staffs struggle to perform their tasks because control doctrine has become excessively commander centric, fractured and spread between several manuals and has not changed to account for changes to command doctrine. Army staffs struggle to succeed because doctrine does not fully define the role or requirements of the staff and does not fully educate officers to execute their duties. The army should consider addressing this shortcoming by incorporating contemporary business theories and models into Army staff doctrine.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 24, 2018
Accession Number
AD1071568

Entities

People

  • David A. Meyer

Organizations

  • School of Advanced Military Studies

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • C4I
  • Cyber

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Command And Control
  • Command And Control Systems
  • Commerce
  • Control Systems
  • Doctrine
  • Education
  • Governments
  • Guidance
  • Lessons Learned
  • Management Personnel
  • Military Organizations
  • New York
  • Organization Theory
  • Students
  • Test And Evaluation
  • Training
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Military History / Militaries and War Studies
  • Military Training and Readiness Simulation
  • Organizational Process Management (OPM).

Technology Areas

  • Fully Networked C3
  • Fully Networked C3 - Command and Control