Evaluating Critical Points in Trajectories

Abstract

People form beliefs about intentions and preferences of robots as they observe robot movement. However, robots rarely optimize their movement to allow people to easily determine state preferences. In this work, we define critical points along robot trajectories that convey information about state preferences: inflection points are changes in direction and compromise points are the relative proportion of preferred states to non-preferred ones. We contribute an approach for automatically generating trajectory demonstrations with specified critical points, and test observers abilities to understand and generalize our robots preferences based on our generated demonstrations. Our results show that inflection points helped participants understand state preference ordering and allowed them to more accurately predict paths through new environments, while compromise points hindered understanding. We conclude that robots should evaluate their trajectories for critical points to increase human observer understanding.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 2017
Accession Number
AD1086806

Entities

People

  • Henny Admoni
  • Rosario Scalise
  • Shen Li
  • Siddhartha Srinivasa
  • Stephanie Rosenthal

Organizations

  • Carnegie Mellon University

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Autonomy

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Algorithms
  • Bayesian Networks
  • Demonstrations
  • Department Of Defense
  • Engineering
  • Environment
  • Fungi
  • Human-Machine Interaction
  • Human-Robot Interaction
  • Military Research
  • Models
  • Observers
  • Reasoning
  • Robots
  • Side Effects
  • Software Development
  • Trajectories

Readers

  • Gender and Food Studies
  • Robotics and Automation.
  • Strategic Security Studies

Technology Areas

  • AI & ML
  • AI & ML - Autonomous Systems
  • AI & ML - Bayesian Inference
  • Autonomy