British Defense Policy and the Logic of Deterrence.

Abstract

In the 2015 Strategic Defence and Security Review deterrence assumed a position of central prominence within British defense policy: this reflected NATO's renewed focus on deterrence following Russia's 2014 invasion of the Ukraine. This monograph examines the logic of deterrence's prominence in, and the way in which it contributes to the wider aims of British defense policy. The traditional understanding of deterrence as a dyadic relationship is inadequate, and leads to a limited appreciation of deterrence's utility. Deterrence should be considered in terms of three faces: a dyadic relationship; a form of group communication; and a social construction. These three faces expand the utility of deterrence, and the strategic possibilities a deterrent relationship offers the state. Considered within the context of British defense policy, the United Kingdom's deterrent posture reduces the likelihood of Russia conducting military action against a NATO member state, but its most important contribution is in the maintenance of the United Kingdom's global influence. Deterrence is necessary to maintain the "Special Relationship" with the United States, and to ensure the United Kingdom has a leading role within international organizations.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 24, 2018
Accession Number
AD1087262

Entities

People

  • David T. M. Welford

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Cold War
  • Construction
  • Deterrence
  • Foreign Policy
  • Governments
  • Instructors
  • Intergovernmental Organizations
  • International Organizations
  • International Relations
  • International Security
  • National Security
  • New York
  • Security
  • United Kingdom
  • United States
  • Universities

Fields of Study

  • Political science

Readers

  • East Asian Political and Security Studies within the Soviet Union
  • Irregular Warfare and Special Operations Cyberspace Operations against Adversarial Threats.
  • Theoretical Analysis.