Assessment of the Relationship Between Rucksack Load and Standing Metabolic Rate

Abstract

There is a lack of quantitative data describing the impact that added load has on an individual's standing metabolic rate. Fourteen male US Army Soldiers (age 21 plus or minus 2 years; height 174 plus or minus 7 cm; body mass 73 10 kg) stood 6 minutes with four loads (0, 22, 44, and 66 percent body mass) while wearing a respirator mask connected to a metabolic cart. Oxygen uptake was not significantly different between the 0 percent and 22 percent BM loads (p = 0.294) but was significantly higher with the 44 percent BM load versus both 0 percent BM and 22 percent BM (p < 0.05) loads. The 66 percent BM rucksack induced significantly greater oxygen uptake than the 0, 22, and 44 percent BM (p < 0.05). Light rucksack loads ( less than or equal to 22 percent body mass) have a negligible effect on standing metabolic rate that may not be physiologically important. However, heavier rucksack loads ( greater than or equal to 44 percent body mass) elicit more pronounced metabolic responses that cannot be overlooked.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 01, 2020
Accession Number
AD1098483

Entities

People

  • Adam W Potter
  • Andrew S. Marrero
  • Anthony J. Karis
  • David P. Looney
  • Diana P. Sanford
  • Elizabeth M. Doughty
  • Holly L. Mcclung
  • Peter S. Figueiredo
  • Sai V. Vangala
  • William R. Santee

Organizations

  • United States Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Energy and Power Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Analysis Of Variance
  • Biomedical Research
  • Body Weight
  • Carriages
  • Data Science
  • Department Of Defense
  • Energy Efficiency
  • Information Science
  • Injury Prevention
  • Institutional Review Board
  • Instructions
  • Measurement
  • Military Research
  • Physical Activity
  • Risk
  • Spreadsheet Software
  • Statistical Analysis

Readers

  • Cardiovascular Physiology
  • Gender and Food Studies
  • Materials Science