Ability of Ballistic Eyewear to Maintain Protection with Primary Blast Shock Waves

Abstract

A helmet-wearing headform embedded with pressure sensors at the left (OS) and right (OD) corneal planes was exposed to blast pressures of 10, 20, 30, and 40 psi at orientations of 0, 45, 90, 135, and 180 degrees with respect to head rotation. Statistical comparisons were made among 3 groups: a baseline control with no protective eyewear (N=16), ballistic goggles (N=17), and ballistic spectacles (N=18). Adverse events were defined as eyewear breakage or displacement, helmet displacement, or chinstrap failure. A total of 51 records were obtained during 53 blast tests. The paired t-test and Pearson's Chi-Squared test were applied at a p<0.05 significance threshold. For the 0 degree orientation, both goggles (OD:p=0.031; OS:p=0.034) and spectacles (OD:p=0.044; OS:p=0.047) significantly reduced the peak corneal pressure compared to no protection, with goggles being more effective (p=0.004).

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Sep 29, 2020
Accession Number
AD1110959

Entities

People

  • John S. Martin
  • Michael K. Smolek
  • Thomas H. Harding

Organizations

  • Applied Research Associates (United States)
  • United States Army Aeromedical Research Lab

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Abstracts
  • Blast
  • Blast Injuries
  • Blast Waves
  • Department Of Defense
  • Displacement
  • Explosions
  • Explosive Devices
  • Explosives
  • Eye Injuries
  • High Energy
  • High Explosives
  • Medical Personnel
  • Military Personnel
  • Orientation (Direction)
  • Platforms
  • Sequences
  • Shock Tubes
  • Shock Waves
  • Technical Information Centers
  • Trauma
  • Tubes
  • Virginia
  • Waves
  • Wounds And Injuries

Readers

  • Brain and Cognitive Science; Experimental Psychology; Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Circadian Sleep-Wake Regulation and Chronobiology
  • Combustion Dynamics and Shock Wave Physics.