The Ethical Issues of Combat Related Employment of Women

Abstract

The intent of the above passage seems clear. It proposes that all men are equal and free to pursue their own goals. Not surprisingly, there is only the mention of "men." It would be a mistake to assume that the authors used the word "men" in a generic sense like "mankind" to mean both men and women because at the time of The Declaration of Independence, women were still regarded as being subservient to men. Regardless, most reasonable people today support the idea of equality for women. One only needs to look as far as our efforts in the Middle East where for years we have been trying to convince the Muslim people that women should have the same rights and freedoms as men. As well, over the past few decades, more and more armies have allowed and encouraged women to enter into military service. Nevertheless, if we really accept the idea that women and men are equal, why do many armies, including the United States Army, still restrict women's employment to non-combat roles?

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Nov 16, 2005
Accession Number
AD1137604

Entities

People

  • Derek J. Bisson

Organizations

  • United States Army Sergeants Major Academy

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Army
  • Army Personnel
  • Employment
  • Field Conditions
  • Human Rights
  • Infantry
  • Middle East
  • Military Research
  • New York
  • Physical Fitness
  • Second World War
  • Standards
  • Students
  • Training
  • United States
  • Warfare

Readers

  • East Asian Political and Security Studies within the Soviet Union
  • Educational Psychology
  • Gender and Food Studies