Data Collection Tools for River Geomorphology Studies: LiDAR and Traditional Methods

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to highlight LiDAR data usage for geomorphic studies and compare to other remote sensing technologies. This review further identifies survey efficiencies and issues that can be problematic in using LiDAR digital elevation models (DEMs) in completing surveys and geomorphic analysis. US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) geospatial data collection guidance (EM 1110-1-1000) (USACE 2015) aligns with the American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Positional Accuracy Standards for Digital Geospatial Data (ASPRS 2014). Geomorphic assessment technologies are rapidly evolving, and LiDAR data collection methods are at the forefront. The FluvialGeomorph (FG) toolbox, developed to support USACE watershed planning, is a recent example of the use of LiDAR high-resolution terrain data to provide a new, efficient approach for rapid watershed assessments (Haring et al. 2020; Haring and Biedenharn 2021). However, there are advantages and disadvantages in using LiDAR data compared to other remote sensing technologies and traditional topographic field survey methods.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Dec 01, 2021
Accession Number
AD1154176

Entities

People

  • Christopher Haring

Organizations

  • Engineer Research and Development Center

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Space

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Acquisition
  • Aircrafts
  • Artificial Satellites
  • Engineering
  • Geographic Information Systems
  • Global Navigation Satellite Systems
  • Global Positioning Systems
  • High Resolution
  • Inertial Navigation
  • Inertial Navigation Systems
  • Lasers
  • Lidar
  • Navigation
  • Remote Sensing
  • Three Dimensional
  • United States
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

Fields of Study

  • Environmental science

Readers

  • Coastal and Marine Engineering/Sediment Transport/Hydraulic Engineering
  • Computer Vision.
  • Systems Analysis and Design