Personnel Mobilization for Sustained Large-Scale Combat Operations: The Future is in the Past

Abstract

As the US Army transforms its organization and doctrine for great power competition in the twenty-first-century, it aims to support Multi-Domain Operations (MDO) as part of the joint force's execution of the National Defense Strategy and National Military Strategy. In doing so, army leaders express confidence in the force's ability to achieve strategic objectives in "weeks not months." The MDO concept's focus on achieving quick success ignores history, and minimizes the relevance of having a robust and functional mobilization support structure. However, the aforementioned strategy documents agree that adversaries in great power competition possess peer or near-peer capability with the United States in all domains. This monograph analyzes the US Army's response to aggression by the Communist Korean People's Army (KPA), and the subsequent requirement to rapidly expand US Regular Army endstrength from 591,487 in June 1950 to 1,552,000 in June 1951. Personnel mobilization and force expansion for enduring large-scale combat operations in Korea were principally army problems to solve; that remains true today. In 1946, fresh from victory in World War II, United States leaders placed great confidence in the US military's ability to respond to potential threats. They did so without fully understanding that the post-war force in no way resembled the massive organization fielded to defeat the Axis powers. Worse, immediate post-war mobilization planning followed an outdated paradigm, assuming a lengthy interval between the onset of hostilities and the first battlefield encounters. Thus, the mobilization plan proceeded deliberately, requiring three months just to prepare cadre and infrastructure, seven months to generate the first fully-trained individuals, and even longer to prepare units for combat.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 27, 2021
Accession Number
AD1160646

Entities

People

  • Andrew A. Brown

Organizations

  • School of Advanced Military Studies

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Counter WMD
  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Army Personnel
  • Artillery
  • Combat Operations
  • Department Of Defense
  • Doctrine
  • Korean War
  • Law
  • Management Personnel
  • Military History
  • Military Science
  • Military Training
  • Multi-Domain Operations
  • National Guard
  • National Security
  • New York
  • Second World War
  • Security
  • Students
  • Training
  • United States
  • United States Military Academy
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Maritime Combat Support and Expeditionary Logistics.
  • Military History / Militaries and War Studies
  • Strategic Security Studies