Hedging in the ASEAN Region: The Case of Singapore and Indonesia

Abstract

The United States, especially the military, relies upon a network of allies and partners to project power and facilitate strength in the region. China's rise as a dominant power, which causes uncertainty in the regional power structure, has resulted in states hedging their interests until this competition dynamic is resolved. Hedging is damaging to the U.S. because a central strategy in its security and foreign policy are alliances. This is not so for China. The U.S. must adjust its strategy and policy to counter the Pacific Region counties' hedging practices, or it risks being denied access and influence because countries will avoid the alignment, which could damage their relationship with China. The U.S. must align foreign policy to meet ASEAN countries' interests and pursue win-win strategies for all parties. It must stay consistently engaged in ASEAN and provide support for this multilateral system. Finally, the U.S. must prove to ASEAN that it is committed to the region with policy that can survive presidential administrations.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Apr 15, 2021
Accession Number
AD1178074

Entities

People

  • Benjamin C. Leatherbury

Organizations

  • Marine Corps University

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Agreements
  • Department Of Defense
  • Economics
  • Foreign Policy
  • Foreign Relations
  • Geography
  • Governments
  • Health Care
  • Humanitarian Assistance
  • International Law
  • International Organizations
  • International Security
  • Military Facilities
  • Military Training
  • National Politics
  • National Security
  • Security
  • South China Sea
  • Southeast Asia
  • Training
  • Treaties
  • United States

Fields of Study

  • Political science

Readers

  • Asian Economic Studies
  • Strategic Security Studies