A Systematic Review of Instruments Measuring Team Resilience

Abstract

A systematic review of the resilience literature was performed to identify and evaluate the methodological qualities of team resilience measures. Five measures were identified that met screening and inclusion criteria. These measures assessed a broad spectrum of constructs and sampled employees across different occupations, industries, and countries. These measures assessed state-resilience directly with self-report items, using the referent shift approach, at the team level of analysis. While most measures reported some evidence of reliability (e.g., internal consistency, interrater agreement), there was limited evidence of validity (e.g., construct, content, criterion). Based on the limited evidence of reliability and validity, the scientific quality of these measures was determined to be weak. Continued development and improvement in the measurement of team resilience is recommended. Implications of these findings are discussed for theory, research, and practice.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Sep 01, 2022
Accession Number
AD1180353

Entities

People

  • Armando X. Estrada
  • Bridget E. Boyle
  • Cassie A. Berry
  • Colanda R. Cato
  • Shala N. Blue

Organizations

  • Temple University
  • U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Engineered Resilient Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Adolescents
  • Agreements
  • Applied Psychology
  • Coefficients
  • Consistency
  • Factor Analysis
  • Families (Human)
  • Inclusions
  • Literature
  • Measurement
  • Military Families
  • Military Research
  • Personality
  • Psychology
  • Reliability
  • Reliability Engineering
  • Resilience
  • Social Psychology
  • Social Sciences
  • Spectra
  • Statistical Analysis
  • Structural Properties
  • United States

Readers

  • Organizational Process Management (OPM).
  • Psychometric Testing or Psychological Assessment.