Improving Anaesthesia and Sedation through the Battlefield

Abstract

Large numbers of NATO personnel have been injured over the last two decades in recent high intensity combat operations. These personnel would almost certainly have required at least one episode of anaesthesia or procedural sedation. However, there are currently no standardised NATO guidelines for anaesthesia or sedation. This could be a significant concern as anaesthesia providers credentials, qualifications and practices will vary amongst NATO contributing forces. Combat related injuries differ significantly from those sustained in civilian trauma care and are characterised by an increased proportion of blast related injuries as well as high energy transfer penetrating injuries. The injuries sustained are often multiple and may be combined with blunt trauma and burns. Consequently, the anaesthesia and sedation in the combat environment will differ from the civilian setting. Also, the military environment is characterised by multiple patient transfers and interventions at different levels of care where capabilities of providers and equipment vary between different nations and at different echelons of care.HFM-250 reviewed the national policies of all the panel contributing nations, as well as other NATO countries where available, in several key areas of anaesthesia and sedation for combat injuries.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 01, 2020
Accession Number
AD1183656

Entities

Organizations

  • NATO Science and Technology Organization

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Airway Management
  • Analgesia
  • Anesthesia
  • Anticonvulsants
  • Brain Injuries
  • Burns
  • Chemical Synthesis
  • Combat Casualty Care
  • Debridement
  • Health Services
  • Medical Evacuation
  • Medical Personnel
  • Patient Care
  • Pharmacies
  • Therapy
  • Thoracic Injuries

Fields of Study

  • Medicine

Readers

  • Materials Science.
  • Neurotrauma and Rehabilitation Medicine.
  • Theoretical Analysis.