Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Implant Placement Related to the Use of Dynamic Navigation Compared to Fully Guided and Conventional Implant Placement Using an Out-of-Bounds Guide

Abstract

This study compares the accuracies of dynamic navigation, fully limiting static guide, and out of-bounds guide modalities for implant planning and placement. Materials and methods: A master mandibular model had six implants placed. This model was used to plan the implant locations using the three modalities. A single operator prepared osteotomies and placed 120 implants in 20 experimental models, five models per group (dynamic navigation right, dynamic navigation left, fully guided, out-of-bounds guide). Post-placement cone beam computed tomography was performed on each model and compared to the master model. Errors in angle deviation, entry point deviation, and apex deviation were recorded and analyzed.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 16, 2022
Accession Number
AD1186340

Entities

People

  • Alyssa-joy T. Oviatt

Organizations

  • Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Accuracy
  • Clinical Trials
  • Computers
  • Data Science
  • Department Of Defense
  • Depth
  • Governments
  • Guidance
  • Information Science
  • Instructions
  • Jaw
  • Materials
  • Navigation
  • Precision
  • Prostheses And Implants
  • Prosthetics
  • Regression Analysis
  • Statistical Analysis
  • Teeth
  • Three Dimensional
  • United States Government
  • X-Ray Computed Tomography

Readers

  • Battery Technology and Engineering
  • Fluid Dynamics.
  • Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (PNT) Technology.