Patient Preference Between the ProSomnus IA and TAP3 Mandibular Advancement Devices in Patients Who Brux: A Qualitative Analysis
Abstract
Study Objectives:This qualitative analysis compared patient preference between a modified ProSomnus IA and TAP 3 appliances in patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and bruxism.Methods: A ProSomnus IA modified with the wings extended laterally 2 mm and a TAP 3 MAD were prescribed to 13 patients with bruxism and OSA. One MAD was delivered and used for one month. After one month the patient returned to the clinic and received the second MAD. At the final appointment the patient was asked which device was preferred for long-term treatment.Results: Eight of 13 patients enrolled in this study preferred the ProSomnus IA for treatment of OSA over the TAP 3. One patient was not able to tolerate either device and two dropped out of the study. The two patients who preferred the TAP 3 also used a CPAP simultaneously. Conclusion:The modified ProSomnus IA was the preferred device for patients with OSA and bruxism. Patients who used the CPAP and a MAD preferred the TAP 3 initially however those two patients later switched back to the ProSomnus IA due to issues with their TAP 3.Practical Implications: Choosing the preferred device first will allow the patient to potentially receive successful treatment for OSA and bruxism in a timelier manner, increasing compliance, saving valuable clinic time and preventing costly remakes.
Document Details
- Document Type
- Technical Report
- Publication Date
- Apr 01, 2024
- Accession Number
- AD1223248
Entities
People
- Andrew S. Ryser
- Jennifer V. Sabol
- Kyung Kim
- Maddie E. Ryser
- Patricia Walworth
- Sloan Mclaughlin
- Steven E. Handel
- Walter Dimalanta