Theoretical and Experimental Comparisons of the Nonlinear Energy Method to the J-Integral, R-Curve and COD Methods in Fracture Toughness Testing,

Abstract

Because of the current high degree of interest in the development of a standard nonlinear test method, analytical and experimental comparisons have been made between the R-curve, Crack Opening Displacement (COD), J-integral and nonlinear energy methods. A general definition of fracture toughness is proposed and the fundamental definitions of each method are compared to it. Experimental comparisons between the COD, J-integral, nonlinear energy and standard ASTM methods have been made for a series of compact tension tests on several aluminum alloys. The fracture toughness values obtained by the COD method were significantly higher than the toughness values obtained by the other three methods. All of the methods displayed a tendency to yield higher toughness values as the thickness was decreased below the ASTM plane strain requirement.

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 01, 1975
Accession Number
ADA012423

Entities

People

  • D. L. Jones
  • H. Liebowitz
  • P. K. Poulose

Organizations

  • George Washington University

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Alloys
  • Aluminum
  • Aluminum Alloys
  • Displacement
  • Integrals
  • J Integrals
  • Standards
  • Test Methods
  • Thickness
  • Toughness

Readers

  • Calculus or Mathematical Analysis
  • Mechanical Engineering/Mechanics of Materials.
  • Metallurgy