Comparative Racial Analysis of Enlisted Advancement Exams: Item- Difficulty.

Abstract

An item-analysis of 24 Navy Enlisted Advancement Exams was conducted to determine which test characteristics might account for the higher promotion rate of White than Black racial groups. Specific questions addressed included (1) whether it is feasible to construct exams containing only items which are similar in difficulty for both Blacks and Whites, (2) what types of items are similar in difficulty, and (3) whether the same items are relatively easy or difficult for Blacks and Whites. The proportion of items identified as similar in difficulty for both Blacks and Whites varied from about one-half to six- sevenths of the 150 items in each test. The similar-type items were concentrated in the difficult range, and presented applied (as distinguished from conceptual) content. Relative item-difficulty was low on some exams. The development of advancement exams of items similar in difficulty for Blacks and Whites could not be recommended, because the concentration of similar-difficulty items in the difficult range would degrade test quality, and items largely limited to factual content might not cover all necessary content for a particular occupational specialty.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jul 01, 1975
Accession Number
ADA014549

Entities

People

  • David W. Robertson
  • Marjorie H. Royle

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Air Force Facilities
  • Classification
  • Education
  • Enlisted Personnel
  • Ethnic Groups
  • Human Resources
  • Military Research
  • Minority Groups
  • Naval Personnel
  • Personnel Management
  • Personnel Selection
  • Prejudice
  • Security
  • Social Sciences
  • Training
  • United States

Fields of Study

  • Education

Readers

  • Gender and Food Studies
  • Psychometric Testing or Psychological Assessment.
  • Systems Analysis and Design