Comparison Test of Drivers Night Vision Devices, M60 Series

Abstract

Test evaluations of night vision devices were as follows: Two of the three test drivers preferred the AN/VVS-2 passive viewer (which can only be used in closed hatch, since it is a periscope) over all other systems. The third driver preferred the AN/PVS-5 goggles but only in the open-hatch mode. All three drivers were dissatisfied with the AN/PVS-5 goggles in the closed-hatch mode, preferring them only over the M24 IR system. Their choices were based on ease of use, confidence in the system, and comfort. Controls on test items are conveniently located, sensitive to touch, and easily identifiable in darkness. The three drivers felt that only the M24 impaired their depth perception Two of the three drivers felt that the AN/VVS-2 passive viewer afforded the best field of view. The third driver preferred the AN/PVS-5 goggles in the open hatch. None of the drivers felt that there were any safety hazards associated with operating the test and comparison items.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Apr 09, 1973
Accession Number
ADA018187

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Engineering
  • Engineers
  • Human Factors Engineering
  • Illumination
  • Images
  • Light Sources
  • Night Vision
  • Night Vision Devices
  • Observers
  • Perception
  • Periscopes
  • Photonic Metamaterials
  • Power Supplies
  • Standards
  • Test And Evaluation
  • United States
  • Vehicles

Readers

  • Aviation Safety Risk Assessment.
  • Materials Science
  • Vision Science/Vision Psychology/Cognitive Neuroscience.