Historical and Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Women in Combat

Abstract

Although Arab, Israeli, Norwegian, and Yugoslav women have served in combat, and, after the truce is signed, returned to traditional female roles, there is a strong resistance in the United States to using women in combat situations. Repeated surveys indicate that civilians are more opposed to the idea of women in combat than are Army personnel. It may very likely be that not using women as fighting soldiers is a cultural tradition of stable nations. Women are luxuries to be pampered and petted. To admit that women must be used as combat soldiers implies a nation in decadence. But, many American women in the Army, Navy and Air Force do not think so. They want to have the full rights of citizenship -- implying full responsibility. And that means service in combat arms units, onboard fighting ships and flying combat airplanes.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 1976
Accession Number
ADA026057

Entities

People

  • Nora S. Kinzer

Organizations

  • U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Defense
  • Army Personnel
  • Artillery
  • Civil War
  • Employment
  • Health Services
  • Medical Personnel
  • Military Personnel
  • Military Tactics
  • Personnel Management
  • Rifles
  • Second World War
  • Students
  • Training
  • United States
  • United States Military Academy
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Gender and Food Studies
  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.
  • Military Science