Vulnerabilities and Strengths of Democratic and Totalitarian Systems Confronted by Civilian-Based Defense.

Abstract

Employment of military force in times of crisis is increasingly questionable. Therefore, other means of international suasion increase in importance. One form is civilian-based defense (CBD) which is lauded by proponents as 'tough' and 'pragmatic.' Democratic and totalitarian societies each have their strengths and weaknesses in dealing with it. Totalitarians may go so far as genocide against which nonviolent resistance is largely helpless. They are little bound traditional concepts of morality and humanity. Democratic states have more inhibitions. So, though CBD may be less fierce against them, it is far more likely to be effective. Totalitarians are also more practiced in regimentation. They are likely to interpret ostentatious preparations for CBD as signs of weakness and a virtual come-on. (Author)

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Oct 26, 1976
Accession Number
ADA033007

Entities

People

  • Harold C. Deutsch

Organizations

  • United States Army War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Employment
  • Foreign Relations
  • Genocide
  • Governments
  • Humanities
  • International Organizations
  • National Security
  • Personality
  • Resistance
  • Second World War
  • Security
  • Training
  • United States
  • War
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare
  • Weapons

Fields of Study

  • Political science

Readers

  • Educational Psychology
  • Political Violence and Terrorism Studies.
  • Strategic Security Studies