Unit Versus Differential Weighting Schemes for Decision Making: A Method of Study and Some Preliminary Results

Abstract

A method for generating realistic data is described, and illustrations of how the method can be used to study the efficacy of different data analysis models are given. The method is a Monte Carlo computer simulation of a multivariate process and generates a N by M data matrix where N is the number of observations and M is the number of variables or measurements. The computer program to accomplish this is outlined. Two examples of the use of the method are given. One compares the familiar multiple regression model with simple unit weighting in a well defined prediction problem. The results indicate that multiple regression is superior to unit weighting for prediction purposes, but the differences between the two models are not great. The second example compares several ways of forming weighted and unweighted composites in a multi- attribute decision making context. Some of the conditions in which differential weighting is important in such contexts are specified.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jul 01, 1976
Accession Number
ADA033183

Entities

People

  • David Seaver
  • J. R. Newman
  • Ward Edwards

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Applied Psychology
  • Behavioral Sciences
  • Composite Materials
  • Computational Science
  • Computer Programs
  • Computer Simulations
  • Computers
  • Data Analysis
  • Data Science
  • Factor Analysis
  • Human Factors Engineering
  • Information Science
  • Psychology
  • Simulations
  • Social Psychology
  • Social Sciences
  • Systems Engineering

Fields of Study

  • Mathematics

Readers

  • Approximation Theory.
  • Computational Modeling and Simulation
  • Team-Based Human-Centered Cognitive Task Decision Making and Information Performance.