The Relationship of Readability and Conceptual Level to Performance on a Navy Non-Resident Career Course.

Abstract

The relationships of readability (as measured by the Flesch and Kincaid formulas) and conceptual level (CL) to performance on study questions contained in the Non-Resident Career Course (NRCC) Hull Maintenance Technician 3 and 2, NAVEDTRA 91510 were analyzed. Two samples of study questions, a nonerror sample and an error sample, were drawn from this NRCC. The results show that readability between the nonerror and the error samples, or between the textual passages associated with these samples, does not differ significantly. The results do show, however, that the conceptual level (thinking) required to answer the study questions is related to error rate. That is, high error rate study questions are associated with higher conceptual levels than are zero error rate study questions. Methods are presented for using high and low CL study questions to improve the training effectiveness of NRCCs.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Oct 01, 1976
Accession Number
ADA034287

Entities

People

  • Robert E. Doucette
  • Robert J. Biersner

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • C4I
  • Human Systems
  • Space

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Air Force Facilities
  • Biomedical Research
  • Cognition
  • Comprehension
  • Distance Learning
  • Education
  • Enlisted Personnel
  • Human Resources
  • Instructors
  • Materials
  • Naval Personnel
  • Psychology
  • Statistics
  • Students
  • Thinking
  • Training

Readers

  • Approximation Theory.
  • Psychometric Testing or Psychological Assessment.
  • STEM Education