From Nibble to Fribble: America's Relations with Dictators.

Abstract

Possible responses to the question (whether asked for innocent or ideological reasons) 'Why does the United States prop up dictators' is discussed. Dividing all 160 states of the world into 4 categories (Communist totalitarians, non-Communist totalitarians, democracies, and the others--mostly authoritarian), the discussion analyzes why the United States does not support Communist dictators, why it does support democracies, and why, and on what basis, it interacts with non-Communist dictators and with the other nations. In the latter two categories, United States support is highly selective; the United States supports some, but not others. Projecting influence via various means (including intervention, when invited), the United States attempts to evaluate each case on its merits, including the state of world opinion concerning undemocratic regimes. The primary criterion, however, is always, as it must be, national interests, e.g., considering all factors pro and con, what is the net impact on American national interests of support or nonsupport of each particular regime in each particular country.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Dec 03, 1976
Accession Number
ADA034392

Entities

People

  • Anthony L. Wermuth

Organizations

  • United States Army War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Space
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Cold War
  • Department Of State
  • Foreign Aid
  • Foreign Policy
  • Foreign Relations
  • Governments
  • International Law
  • International Relations
  • National Politics
  • National Security
  • Political Science
  • Political Systems
  • Security
  • South Africa
  • United States
  • United States Government
  • War Colleges

Readers

  • Political Violence and Terrorism Studies.
  • Strategic Security Studies