Qualitative Constraints on Conventional Armaments. Volume I. Summary,

Abstract

This study is an investigation of the desirability and feasibility of placing qualitative constraints on conventional arms competitions by means of negotiated arms control agreements. Using an inductive and empirical approach, the study develops a conceptual structure for determining whether US arms control policy should pursue such constraints in particular situations. Past experience in arms control and the principal issues involved are surveyed with attention to qualitative aspects, and the evidence of the present importance of and motivations for qualitative weapon improvement is reviewed, adducing examples in five areas of arms competition. The utility of qualitative constraints is discussed in terms of identifiable objectives; feasibility conditions are indicated and the basic forms of control are specified and analyzed. Possible types of agreement embodying desirable and feasible constraints are examined and illustrated by four candidate agreements in major areas of arms competition. Conclusions are presented indicating the circumstances under which qualitative constraints would be both desirable and feasible. (Author)

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jul 01, 1976
Accession Number
ADA034809

Entities

People

  • Robert A. Gessert
  • William W. Cover

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Counter WMD
  • Ground and Sea Platforms

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Agreements
  • Aircrafts
  • Arms Control
  • Arms Control Treaties
  • Governments
  • Intergovernmental Organizations
  • International Organizations
  • International Relations
  • National Security
  • Negotiations
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Procurement
  • Strategic Weapons
  • Test And Evaluation
  • Treaties
  • United States
  • Weapons Effects

Readers

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • International Relations and European Studies
  • Systems Analysis and Design