Force Structure and Manpower Management Study.

Abstract

The Force Structure and Manpower Management Study Corporation during the period from November 1975 through October 1976 had overall objectives of: recommending and assisting in implementing near-term improvements to the Army manpower management system, and recommending long-term improvements to that system. This one-volume Final Report also constitutes the Phase IV Report of the study. Phase IV was devoted to monitoring and assisting in implementing approved Phase III recommendations for near-term improvements, and continued research to develop recommendations concerning long-term measures for improving HQDA manpower management functional procedures, MIS capabilities, and organizational structures. Section 1 of the Final Report provides background information on the study as a whole. The remaining sections of this report address accomplishment of Phase IV tasks, as follows: Monitor and aid implementation of measures aimed at near-term improvements; Assist in planning for fordims implementation and subsequent use; Develop conceptual methods foor tracking manpower actions from HQDA to field level and back; and Recommend long-term improvement measures.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Oct 31, 1976
Accession Number
ADA036126

Entities

People

  • Charles R. Darby
  • Harold K. Roach
  • James M. Stoy
  • Jasper M. Mccurdy
  • Rodney D. Mundy

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • C4I
  • Human Systems
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Business Administration
  • Civilian Personnel
  • Command And Control
  • Communication Systems
  • Control Systems
  • Data Processing
  • Department Of Defense
  • Employment
  • Engineers
  • Information Systems
  • Instructors
  • Management Personnel
  • Manpower Utilization
  • Military Personnel
  • Military Science
  • Organizational Structure
  • Personnel Management

Readers

  • Defense Financial Management and Audit.
  • Instructional Design and Training Evaluation.
  • Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Autonomous Capabilities and Mission Reconnaissance.