An Evaluation of Very Large Airplanes and Alternative Fuels

Abstract

Very large airplanes using alternative fuels are examined in the context of existing and possible future Air Force missions. Synthetic jet fuel (JP), liquid methane, liquid hydrogen, and nuclear propulsion are the fuel alternatives selected for detailed analysis. Conceptual designs of airplanes using each of these fuels were developed and estimates were made of their lifecycle cost and life-cycle energy consumption. Mission analyses were performed to determine the effectiveness of the alternative airplanes in strategic airlift specifically and in the station-keeping role in general. Results indicate that for most military applications airplanes with gross weights in excess of one million pounds promise to be superior to any comtemporary airplanes in terms of cost-effectiveness and energy-hydrocarbon jet fuel, whether manufactured from oil shale, coal or crude oil, remains the most attractive aviation fuel for future Air Force use. Policy recommendations are made pertaining both to alternative fuels and to advanced-technology large airplanes. Future research and developments are also identified.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Dec 01, 1976
Accession Number
ADA040532

Entities

People

  • L. W. Noggle
  • R. E. Horvath
  • W. F. Hederman
  • W. T. Mikolowsky

Organizations

  • RAND Corporation

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Space

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Aerodynamic Configurations
  • Aircraft Equipment
  • Aircraft Industry
  • Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion
  • Aircrafts
  • Airframes
  • Calorific Value
  • Chemistry
  • Commercial Aircraft
  • Materials Laboratories
  • Materials Processing
  • Materials Science
  • Materials Testing
  • Nuclear Energy
  • Nuclear Materials
  • Nuclear Reactors
  • Transport Aircraft

Readers

  • Aerospace Engineering
  • Life Cycle Cost Analysis
  • Petroleum Engineering