Vietnam, Mao, and Clausewitz.

Abstract

This memorandum discusses the strategies followed by the opposing sides in Vietnam and the influence that the teachings of Clausewitz and Mao Tse-tung had on them. The author concludes that the political limitations placed on military strategy and tactics were not the main cause of the loss of the war in Vietnam. The war was lost because the American strategists, both political and military, chose the wrong strategy. Pacification was the key to victory in Vietnam, not the destruction of the North Vietnamese main force units. The author concludes that if the nature of the war had been correctly understood, American strategists would not talk today of a military victory and political defeat in Vietnam. To do so is not only a contradiction in Clausewitzian terms, but it is also to miss the whole point of the painful experience. (Author)

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 01, 1977
Accession Number
ADA041056

Entities

People

  • William O. Staudenmaier

Organizations

  • United States Army War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • C4I
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Defense
  • Command And Control
  • Communists
  • Doctrine
  • Governments
  • Guerrilla Warfare
  • Insurgency
  • Military Strategy
  • National Security
  • North Vietnam
  • South Vietnam
  • Southeast Asia
  • United States
  • Vietnam
  • War
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Fields of Study

  • Political science

Readers

  • Military History / Militaries and War Studies
  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.