Problems in Measuring Team Effectiveness.

Abstract

Considerable effort has gone into the development of techniques for measuring the job effectiveness of individuals. As a result, procedures are highly developed, documented, and validated. Comparable effort has not been devoted to the development of means of evaluating the performance of teams (i.e., two or more individuals associated in work or activity directed toward a common goal). This paper examines the problems associated with measuring team effectiveness employing the tank crew as the primary medium for discussion. The literature is reviewed and current approaches to measuring team effectiveness in military settings are examined. Topics discussed are: (a) defining effectiveness, (b) distinguishing between true team tasks and tasks which are a simple summation of individual efforts, (c) one-sided vs two-sided engagement simulations in measuring effectiveness, (d) process vs outcome measures, and (e) requirements for and use of available resources. It is concluded that gunnery is the only tank crew function (parts of which might qualify as team tasks) that is currently being assessed, and that these measures are of questionable reliability. (Author)

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 1978
Accession Number
ADA049560

Entities

People

  • Albert L. Kubala

Organizations

  • Human Resources Research Organization

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Human Systems
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Accuracy
  • Air Force
  • Army Training
  • Combat Readiness
  • Doctrine
  • Firing Rate
  • Human Resources
  • Measurement
  • Measures Of Effectiveness
  • Military Organizations
  • Military Research
  • Recognition
  • Test And Evaluation
  • Training
  • Training Devices
  • Warfare
  • Weapons

Readers

  • Military Science
  • Systems Analysis and Design
  • Team-Based Human-Centered Cognitive Task Decision Making and Information Performance.