Blast Tests of Expedient Shelters in the DICE THROW Event,

Abstract

To determine the worst blast environments that eight types of expedient shelters can withstand, we subjected a total of 18 shelters to the 1-kiloton blast effects of Defense Nuclear Agency's DICE THROW main event. These expedient shelters included two Russian and two Chinese types. The best shelter tested was a Small-Pole Shelter that had a box-like room of Russian design with ORNL-designed expedient blast entries and blast doors added. It was undamaged at the 53-psi peak overpressure range; the pressure rise inside was only 1.5 psi. Expedient shelters of the types tested - especially if the ones with shored walls are equipped with blast doors - would afford better protection against the blast and fire effects of nuclear weapons and much better fallout protection than do all but a small fraction of existing buildings. Water storage pits lined with ordinary plastic trash bags were proven practical at up to 53 psi, as were triangular expedient blast doors made of poles.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 01, 1978
Accession Number
ADA052913

Entities

People

  • Conrad V. Chester
  • Cresson H. Kearny

Organizations

  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Counter WMD
  • Space
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force Facilities
  • Blast
  • Cameras
  • Carbon Monoxide
  • Civil Defense
  • Civil Engineering
  • Construction
  • Department Of State
  • Dielectric Gases
  • Materials Laboratories
  • Measurement
  • National Security
  • Strategic Weapons
  • Tensile Strength
  • United States
  • Urban Areas
  • Weapons Effects

Readers

  • Explosive Engineering.
  • Nuclear Civil Defense.