Comparison of the Visual Perception of a Runway Model in Pilots and Nonpilots during Simulated Night Landing Approaches

Abstract

At night, reduced visual cues may promote illusions and a dangerous tendency for pilots to fly low during approaches to landing. Relative motion parallax (a difference in rate of apparent movement of objects in the visual field), a cue that can contribute to visual judgments of glide path angle, was studied for its effect on the nighttime approach problem in two experiments. Neither flying experience nor a visual frame of reference enhanced sensitivity to relative motion parallax. However, errors in horizontal adjustments were smaller in pilots, indicating that flying experience enhances other cues in the runway image. Direct judgments of approach angle magnitude indicated overestimation by an approximate factor of 2. These findings give further evidence of large visual illusions in the nighttime situation and indicate that the ineffectiveness of relative motion parallax may be an important part of the night approach problem.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 01, 1978
Accession Number
ADA054450

Entities

People

  • Henry W. Mertens

Organizations

  • Federal Aviation Administration

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • Ground and Sea Platforms

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Accuracy
  • Air Force
  • Aircraft Landings
  • Aircrafts
  • Analysis Of Variance
  • Aviation Medicine
  • Horizontal Orientation
  • Landing
  • Line Of Sight
  • New York
  • Night Landings
  • Orientation (Direction)
  • Perception
  • Psychology
  • Relative Motion
  • United States
  • Visual Perception

Fields of Study

  • Psychology

Readers

  • Aviation Science / Aeronautics.
  • Geodesy