Deficiency Judgments in Real Estate Eminent Domain Proceedings.

Abstract

This study reviewed the Corps of Engineers' experience with deficiency judgments from land acquisition for civil works projects. Historical data were sampled and analyzed in an attempt to develop a more accurate means of assessing land acquisition costs. It was concluded that three factors generally contribute to the best predictions of total deposits plus deficiencies for a project: (1) the sum of deposits, (2) the fraction of land in Government interests associated with mineral rights and temporary flowage easements, and (3) the fraction of land in the industrial land use category. These factors were developed into a predictive equation. Projects for which settlement costs were severely underestimated by the equation were analyzed to identify circumstances which might lead to unexpectedly high settlements. Such circumstances include: (1) how many small settlements, each relatively large compared to even smaller deposits, and (2) individual high deficiencies stemming from disputes over either equipment evaluation or the effects of easements on an agricultural or industrial operation. (Author)

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 01, 1978
Accession Number
ADA055874

Entities

People

  • Kathleen K. Dornan

Organizations

  • Construction Engineering Research Laboratory

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Acquisition
  • Arkansas
  • Arkansas River
  • Classification
  • Commerce
  • Construction
  • Dams
  • Deficiencies
  • Engineering
  • Engineers
  • Farms
  • Flood Control
  • Floods
  • Governments
  • New England
  • Real Estate
  • United States Military Academy

Readers

  • Coastal and Marine Engineering/Sediment Transport/Hydraulic Engineering
  • Computational Modeling and Simulation
  • Educational Psychology