An Alternative Marine Corps.

Abstract

In 1976, Martin Binkin and Jeffrey Record wrote Where Does the Marine Corps Go From Here. Their proposal was that there is no need for an amphibious capability of current magnitude. One alternative proposed was to reduce this capability by converting a Marine division to an airborne division. This proposal would also deactivate another Marine division and supporting units. The proposal was analyzed from two points: Was it cost effective; would it leave the United States a less responsive defensive posture. Analysis of the proposal uncovered unanswered questions; important variables had not been considered. Quantitative costs had only been partially covered; qualitative costs were unaddressed. The proposal from that aspect was not cost effective. The study determined, contrary to the authors' claim, the proposal would weaken the United States defense posture in two ways: by assigning the airborne mission to the Marine Corps which has minimal airborne expertise or logistical base to adequately ensure its accomplishment; of greater impact, adoption would reduce our current amphibious force by two-thirds, making it relatively unresponsive for meeting crises.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 09, 1978
Accession Number
ADA057751

Entities

People

  • Jon K. Rider

Organizations

  • United States Army Command and General Staff College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Aerial Warfare
  • Air Force
  • Amphibious Operations
  • Artillery
  • Employment
  • Fixed Wing Aircraft
  • Law
  • Military History
  • Military Science
  • National Security
  • Naval Operations
  • Naval Warfare
  • Navy
  • Second World War
  • Tactical Air Support
  • United States
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Educational Psychology
  • Life Cycle Cost Analysis
  • Maritime Combat Support and Expeditionary Logistics.