Comparative Nozzle Study for Applying Aqueous Film Forming Foam on Large-Scale Fires

Abstract

A large-scale fire test program was conducted to evaluate the relative fire-fighting effectiveness of applying aqueous film forming foams (AFFF) through commercially available air-aspirating and non air-aspirating nozzles. The Navy MB-1 and P-4A and Air Force P-4 aircraft fire-rescue vehicles were used as nozzle test-beds. Nozzles with rated capacities of 250 gpm and 750 to 800 gpm were tested and evaluated on 4000 square feet and 8000 square feet JP-4 fuel fires, respectively. Eight of the 16 fires conducted contained an aircraft mock-up. The lower expansion, more fluid, longer reach aqueous film forming foams generated with the non air-aspirating type nozzles were found to provide superior fire extinguishing effectiveness compared to the air-aspirating type nozzles. Air-aspirated foams required approximately 50 percent longer to achieve 90 percent fire control than the non air-aspirated foams. No discernible difference in burnback resistance was found for either type of foam.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Apr 01, 1978
Accession Number
ADA058562

Entities

People

  • Edwin J. Jablonski

Organizations

  • United States Naval Research Laboratory

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Aircrafts
  • Cameras
  • Chemistry
  • Fire Fighting
  • Fire Protection
  • Fire Suppression
  • Fires
  • Flow Rate
  • Fuels
  • Materials
  • Military Research
  • Photographs
  • Plastic Explosives
  • Resistance
  • Test Beds
  • Vehicles

Readers

  • Fire Suppression Systems Design.
  • Mathematics or Statistics