Evaluation of a Computer-Assisted Battle Simulation: CAMMS Versus a CPX
Abstract
The Computer-Assisted Map Maneuver System (CAMMS) creates a simulated battle to train battalion and brigade command groups in the exercise of command and control. In contrast to a conventional manual command post exercise (CPX) which is driven by prefabricated messages, CAMMS calculates weapons effects, movement rates, and logistical support in real time to provide the command group with realistic feedback about the consequences of its actions. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the cost and training effectiveness of CAMMS in comparison to a CPX. Players judged CAMMS to be significantly and consistently more realistic and more interesting than a CPX. The principal weaknesses of CAMMS were that it did not produce much stress, and it did not exercise the players in security procedures, such as electromagnetic and communications security, nor did it require them to react to special situations like enemy jamming, chemical, biological, or nuclear warfare. The CPX also received low ratings in these areas. A CAMMS exercise cost 25-30% less than CPX, primarily because CAMMS required much less preparation time. Overall, CAMMS produced a distinctly superior exercise at a moderate saving in cost over a conventional CPX.
Document Details
- Document Type
- Technical Report
- Publication Date
- Apr 01, 1979
- Accession Number
- ADA068014
Entities
People
- Herbert F. Barber
- Ira T. Kaplan
Organizations
- U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences