Evoked Cortical Potentials and Information Processing.

Abstract

In summary, the present findings show that there are perceptual differences between continuous and apparent motion and that these differences may be reflected in the latency and amplitude of the VEP. Furthermore, theoretical and cell system models were presented to account for the observed differences. These models propose that continuous motion is processed by specialized motion detecting cells which may respond to velocity as an intensity factor in motion. In apparent motion, the models suggest that cells would respond to the spatial and temporal change in position over time aspects of this type of motion and the role of velocity as an intensity factor would be diminished. Thus, it is suggested that future studies be undertaken to compare continuous and apparent motion using a wider range of velocity conditions and recording locations. Also, the direction of motion should be systematically examined for both continuous and apparent motion.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 30, 1979
Accession Number
ADA070789

Entities

People

  • John L. Andreassi
  • Joseph A. Gallichio
  • Nancy E. Young

Organizations

  • Baruch College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Brain
  • Computers
  • Detection
  • Detectors
  • Digital Computers
  • Electrodes
  • Eye Movements
  • Head (Anatomy)
  • Information Processing
  • Motion Detectors
  • Nervous System
  • New York
  • Perception
  • Physiology
  • Psychology
  • Sensation
  • Visual Perception

Readers

  • Theoretical Analysis.
  • Vision Science/Vision Psychology/Cognitive Neuroscience.