Psychological Androgyny in a Working Population with Comparison to a College Sample.

Abstract

Sex role orientations were investigated in a working population with comparison to a college sample. The working sample of 124 women and 104 men include 44 first line supervisors and 184 of their subordinates in the Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania. The college sample included 56 women from Bryn Mawr College and 48 men from Haverford College. The Bem Sex-Role Inventory (BSRI), with additional work-related and personal interaction items, was administered to the two samples as a self-description scale, and to the working sample as a target attribution scale to describe male and female co-workers. When BSRI scores were classified according to median splits for the industrial sample, men tended to be classified as masculine and undifferentiated (low on both masculine and feminine dimensions) more frequently than women. Women were more frequently classified as feminine. Sex role orientation was weakly associated with favorable perceptions of opposite sex co-workers, Androgynous (high on both masculine and feminine dimensions) and masculine men, and androgynous and feminine women assigned the most favorable ratings to both same and opposite sex co-workers.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 01, 1978
Accession Number
ADA072410

Entities

People

  • Faris R. Kirkland
  • Grant R. Grissom
  • Jerene Good

Organizations

  • University City Science Center

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Business Administration
  • California
  • Education
  • Employment
  • Human Resources
  • Management Personnel
  • Military Personnel
  • Military Research
  • New York
  • Organizational Structure
  • Personnel Management
  • Psychology
  • Public Administration
  • Resource Management
  • Social Psychology
  • Students
  • Training

Fields of Study

  • Psychology

Readers

  • Gender and Food Studies
  • Organizational Psychology.