Relationship between Officer Duty Performance and Certain Measures of Potential

Abstract

As part of on-going research on prediction of leader effectiveness, the performance of students in the Army Officer Basic Course (OBC) was measured by the seven scales of the standard Officer Evaluation Battery, OBC final grades, and peer ratings made halfway through the course and at the end of the course. Later duty performance was assessed by the standard Officer Efficiency Report and the special-purpose Performance Evaluation Form. Statistical correlations indicated that duty performance was predicted best by final peer ratings and next best by grades, both in general and for personnel in noncombat arms branches. For combat arms personnel, however, final peer ratings and course grades appeared about equally predictive. These findings confirm other research on the value of peer ratings.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jul 01, 1979
Accession Number
ADA075409

Entities

People

  • Arthur C. Gilbert

Organizations

  • U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Applied Psychology
  • Army
  • Artillery
  • Efficiency
  • Leadership
  • Libraries
  • Marine Corps
  • Military Research
  • Psychology
  • Ratings
  • Reliability
  • Social Sciences
  • Students
  • Test And Evaluation
  • Training
  • United States Military Academy
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Military Leadership and Professional Education.
  • Psychometric Testing or Psychological Assessment.
  • Technical Research and Report Writing.