Retention of Basic Soldiering Skills

Abstract

Field Artillery Training Center (FATC) evaluators tested soldier's performance on twenty basic common tasks. The sample included who were completing entry-level training and soldiers who has completed this entry training during the previous 12 months. Training Center evaluators rated task performance 'GO' or NO GO' for each task step and for the task as a whole. Tasks varied in the rate at which the percent 'GO' declined since training. Three factors accounted for most of the differences in retention: (1) number of task steps, (2) order of original training, and (3) the presence or absence of subtasks. Soldiers can perform most task steps. The steps that are forgotten tend to be those that are not suggested by the previous sequence of steps or by the equipment. Commanders can use the research results to determine the relationship between soldier proficiency and time since training. Commanders can schedule training to maintain desired levels of proficiency in critical skills. The eventual research goal is to develop guidelines for determining which tasks require frequent training and which tasks can be maintained at high proficiency for long periods without practice. (Author)

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Sep 01, 1979
Accession Number
ADA075412

Entities

People

  • J. D. Dressel
  • Joyce L. Shields
  • Stephen L. Goldberg

Organizations

  • U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Anti-Tank Weapons
  • Artillery
  • Basic Training
  • Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
  • Doctrine
  • Gas Masks
  • Grenade Launchers
  • Health Services
  • Machine Guns
  • Military Personnel
  • Military Research
  • Numbers
  • Social Sciences
  • Systems Engineering
  • Task Performance And Analysis
  • Trainees
  • Training

Readers

  • Brain and Cognitive Science; Experimental Psychology; Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Instructional Design and Training Evaluation.