Automated Procedures for Obtaining and Scoring Peer Ratings,

Abstract

The present study indicated the feasibility of adapting computer techniques to the rating process and pointed up the differing operational characteristics of the two methods. With either procedure, both speed and accuracy of scoring ratings and computing average ratings would be increased. If adequate equipment to accommodate a full company of raters were made available, the computerized rating machine could reduce time spent in rating sessions from about one hour (current procedure) to 20 minutes. Results are immediately available. With the current prototype equipment, additional processing of results would be necessary for a computerized assignment procedure, a drawback which could be met by addition of printout equipment. Initial cost of equipment and maintenance costs would be high. With the punched card method, more time would be required for rating sessions than under present procedures. Results would be directly utilizable in a computerized assignment procedure. Cost would be low, since only regular tabulating equipment is required.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Aug 01, 1964
Accession Number
ADA079174

Entities

People

  • Francis F. Medland
  • Jerome Olans

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Accuracy
  • Army
  • Army Personnel
  • Army Training
  • Basic Training
  • Computers
  • Errors
  • Field Tests
  • Leadership Training
  • Machines
  • Power Supplies
  • Prototypes
  • Punched Cards
  • Students
  • Test And Evaluation
  • Trainees
  • Training

Readers

  • Computer Science/Computer Engineering/Data Science/Digital Signal Processing.
  • Psychometric Testing or Psychological Assessment.
  • Systems Analysis and Design