Interaction between Psychological Tests and Curricula in the Marine Hull Repairman Course

Abstract

The results of recent research on Army courses showed that general aptitude, as measured by tests of arithmetic reasoning and verbal ability, has high validity in predicting success in virtually all types of Army training. The presence of this general predictor suggested that the traditional course placed a high demand on the ability to work with concepts. With the reduced level of abstraction in the revised courses, there may be less need for general learning ability, and more need for specific job-related abilities that could reflect a different pattern of aptitudes for success. An ongoing study conducted by BESRL's Differential Classification Work Unit is aimed at gathering evidence about differences in validity patterns of Army classification tests and some experimental tests for courses of the two types--traditional and revised.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Aug 01, 1970
Accession Number
ADA079347

Entities

People

  • Roger L. Williamson

Organizations

  • United States Army Research Laboratory

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Arithmetic
  • Army Personnel
  • Army Training
  • Classification
  • Coefficients
  • Curriculum
  • Education
  • Instructors
  • Inventory
  • Learning
  • Mechanics
  • Psychological Tests
  • Reasoning
  • Regression Analysis
  • Standards
  • Statistical Analysis
  • Training

Fields of Study

  • Psychology

Readers

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Organizational Psychology.
  • STEM Education