Phenolic Wastewater Treatment Alternatives.
Abstract
The Air Force uses phenol compounds primarily in its paint stripping and carbon removal operations, the major portions of which are performed at the Air Logistics Centers (ALCs). Depending on the type operation, the spent phenol either enters the industrial/sanitary waste stream, or is removed and disposed of by a contractor. Several Air Force bases, particularly the ALCs, are experiencing difficulty in meeting increasingly stringent National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit standards for phenols. In addition, new regulations being promulgated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) will impact upon certain treatment and disposal practices. Therefore, the principal objective of this study is to determine the most cost-effective process(es) for the treatment and disposal of these wastes in accordance with existing and proposed environmental regulations. A literature review is conducted which examines the following systems/processes Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) adsorption, ozone oxidation, hydrogen peroxide oxidation, potassium permanganate oxidation, iron (VI) ferrate oxidation, catalytic oxidation, chlorine oxidation, chlorine dioxide oxidation, aeration, recovery, incineration, pyrolysis, landfilling, activated sludge, trickling filter and source control. The results of the cost analyses show that biological processes are by far the most cost-effective alternative for the treatment of paint stripping wastewater at the source. Biological systems are also the most cost-effective for treatment of phenolic wastewater at the industrial or sanitary wastewater treatment plant, closely followed by ozone oxidation.
Document Details
- Document Type
- Technical Report
- Publication Date
- Jun 01, 1980
- Accession Number
- ADA088310
Entities
People
- Robert G. Blum