CONARC Training Workshop, Fort Gordon, Georgia 5-7 October 1971. Volume VI. Quality Control Specialty Workshop.

Abstract

There was almost complete agreement that Army service schools should adopt criterion referenced evaluation as the means of insuring that the trainee can do each job for which he is trained. Also, in agreement that superior performance on one task could not compensate for inadequate performance on another and that in effect our courses should be 'multiple hurdle'. There was recognition that this goal presented problems in group paced courses, because time constraints cause problems in handling failures on an individual basis and because it is difficult to obtain recognition (on manpower surveys) of staffing to support remedial training. The workshop attendees believed the present requirement to identify the honor graduate, the honor students and the upper half of each class as eligible for promotion produces inequities. Whether real or imagined, this proved to be an issue of considerable concern. (Author)

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Oct 01, 1971
Accession Number
ADA089253

Entities

People

  • Ira A. Hunt Jr.
  • James L. Sherrill
  • Ralph E. Haines Jr.
  • Robert N. Johnson
  • William C. Osborn

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Education
  • Engineering
  • Enlisted Personnel
  • Instructors
  • Job Analysis
  • Job Training
  • Performance Tests
  • Personnel Management
  • Psychology
  • Quality Control
  • Recruiting
  • Reliability
  • Standards
  • Students
  • Systems Engineering
  • Task Performance And Analysis
  • Test And Evaluation

Fields of Study

  • Education

Readers

  • Educational Psychology
  • Instructional Design and Training Evaluation.