An Evaluation of Statistical Methods for the Prediction of Maximum Time-Variant Inlet Total Pressure Distortion

Abstract

An analysis was conducted to determine the accuracies and limitations of three statistical methods used to predict engine-face maximum time-variant total pressure distortion. The statistical methods have all been proposed as low-cost alternatives to the time-consuming and costly deterministic method generally used for reducing engine-face time-variant total pressure data. The statistical methods are evaluated by comparing their predicted distortion values and patterns to those measured with the deterministic method. Data comparisons from tests of four different inlet models, covering a wide range of Mach numbers, mass flow ratios, model attitudes, and distortion factors, were used during the analysis. The results show good agreement between the measured and predicted values for all three statistical methods. The distortion pattern predictions, however, were inadequate at conditions with high total pressure fluctuation (turbulence). It is recommended that improvements continue to be made in the statistical methods, particularly adjustments for high-turbulence conditions, and that the Melick method be used as an on-line distortion analysis tool for inlet performance tests.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Sep 01, 1980
Accession Number
ADA089817

Entities

People

  • Marvin E. Sanders
  • Richard J. Christenson

Organizations

  • Arnold Engineering Development Complex

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Agreements
  • Air Force
  • Aircrafts
  • Boundary Layer
  • Computer Programs
  • Computers
  • Corporations
  • Data Analysis
  • Engineering
  • Errors
  • Flow
  • Performance Tests
  • Pressure Distribution
  • Turbines
  • Turbofan Engines
  • Turbojet Engines
  • United States

Readers

  • Adaptive Control and Estimation with Uncertainty in Dynamic Systems.
  • Aerodynamics.
  • Regression Analysis.