Enhancing Quality Control in the Testing of Military Applicants

Abstract

Diverse sources of error must be controlled for aptitude tests to have substantial validity. This paper describes a highly cost effective procedure for immediate verification of the veridicality of operational test scores. A continuous need exists to maintain the high quality of testing procedures and of operational test scores used in selecting and classifying enlisted personnel. In a large-scale testing program such as the one that uses the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB), the risk of test compromise is always present. A cost effective procedure for detecting the incidence of spurious scores was developed, consisting of (a) comparison of scores on two ASVAB subtests to detect any large differences between them, (b) administration of a 10-minute retest to examinees showing the large difference, and (c) comparison of original and retest scores to verify the incidence of likely test compromise. Tryout of the procedure indicated that the 10-minute retest of fewer than 20% of all examinees could detect approximately 70% of all cases of test compromise. (Author)

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Apr 01, 1980
Accession Number
ADA095867

Entities

People

  • M. A. Fischl
  • Robert M. Ross

Organizations

  • U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Arithmetic
  • Army
  • Classification
  • Confidence Limits
  • Enlisted Personnel
  • Instructions
  • Measurement
  • Military Police
  • Military Research
  • Optical Scanning
  • Psychological Tests
  • Psychology
  • Quality Control
  • Security
  • Social Sciences
  • Space Perception
  • Test And Evaluation

Readers

  • Applied Combinatorial Optimization and Logic Circuit Design.
  • Psychometric Testing or Psychological Assessment.