Response Strategies and Individual Differences in Multiple-Task Performance.

Abstract

Three experiments examining individual differences in multiple-task performance are presented. Experiment I examined whether the response strategies used to perform two discrete information processing tasks reflected individual differences in information processing at high levels of workload or simply were selected at random. Each subject's response strategy first was identified as either a simultaneous, an alternating, or a massed strategy. Then some of the subjects were asked to change strategy. The results indicated that the massed response strategy subjects had less well developed timesharing skills and were not able to process information under multiple-task conditions as well as the other subjects regardless of the response strategy used. The results were interpreted as evidence that response strategies represent fundamental differences in multiple-task information processing. Experiments II and III attempted to locate the source of the differences observed in Experiment I. Experiment II examined the relation between multiple-task performance in two different task combinations and cerebral lateralizatoin, multiple-limb coordination, and four tests of cognitive style. No significant relations were found.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Feb 01, 1981
Accession Number
ADA097245

Entities

People

  • Diane L. Damos
  • Thomas E. Smist

Organizations

  • University at Buffalo

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Applied Psychology
  • Behavioral Sciences
  • Control Sticks
  • Control Systems
  • Engineering
  • Flight Training
  • Industrial Engineering
  • Information Processing
  • Information Science
  • New York
  • Parallel Computing
  • Parallel Processing
  • Psychology
  • Reaction Time
  • Regression Analysis
  • Task Performance And Analysis

Fields of Study

  • Biology
  • Psychology

Readers

  • Brain and Cognitive Science; Experimental Psychology; Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Strategic Security Studies