Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield: Critique and Recommendations (Abridged Version).

Abstract

Intelligence preparation of the Battlefield (IPB), outlined in Circulars TC30-27 and TC34-3, represents a major step toward improving procedures for correlating data with enemy intent. The purpose of this report is to show how IPB could be improved by incorporated decision-analytic techniques and computerized decision aids to improve the judgmental process inherent within IPB. The first section of this report describes the necessary dependence on human judgment. This section identifies the different types of judgment inherent in each of the five steps in the IPB analysis process proposed in TC30-27 and TC34-3. The general conclusion is that except for terrain analysis and weather analysis, these circulars fail to tell intelligence analysts how they are to make the judgments necessary to implement the proposed IPB analysis process. The second section of this report describes the results of research studying how well people make the judgments inherent in IPB. The research strongly suggests that people's ability to make these judgments can be improved substantially by training them in decision-analytic techniques and by giving them access to computerized judgement aids. (Author)

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Feb 01, 1981
Accession Number
ADA098627

Entities

People

  • Leonard Adelman
  • Michael L. Donnell
  • Ruth H. Phelps

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • C4I
  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Accuracy
  • Analysts
  • Battles
  • Command And Control
  • Information Processing
  • Intelligence Analysis
  • Intelligence Analysts
  • Intelligence Cycle
  • Judgment
  • Mental Processes
  • Probability
  • Scientific Research
  • Tactical Intelligence
  • Test And Evaluation
  • Threat Evaluation
  • Training
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Military History / Militaries and War Studies
  • Systems Analysis and Design