Using Quit Rates to Set Compensation Levels in the Public Sector.

Abstract

The government can not base the amount it pays its employees on the market value of the services it provides. Instead, it tries to set pay for each job at a level equal to pay for comparable work in private employment. Although a survey of pay for private sector workers is taken each year, there are indications that the survey is faulty and that government pay levels are too high. One indication is that quit rates are considerably lower in the government than in the private sector. Quit rates are a function of pay levels. Other things equal, comparable quit rates indicate comparable pay. The evidence presented in this paper shows that one reason for the lower quit rates in the government is that the government is such a large employer. Large firms have lower quit rates, probably because transfer and promotion are easy within a large firm. Even when firm size is taken into account, however, the quit rate in the government remains lower than the quit rate for equivalent private sector workers, suggesting that compensation (pay plus other benefits) for government is above private compensation. The differential--shown in this paper to be 15 percent--is in line with findings in other studies that make direct pay comparisons, but these results must be considered tentative until other factors that influence the quit rate have been included in the analysis.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 1981
Accession Number
ADA100450

Entities

People

  • Kathleen C. Utgoff

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Benefits
  • Business Administration
  • Civilian Personnel
  • Commerce
  • Department Of Defense
  • Employment
  • Equations
  • Fringe Benefits
  • Governments
  • Labor Markets
  • Manpower
  • Manufacturing
  • Personnel Management
  • Simultaneous Equations
  • Statistics
  • Steel Industry
  • Training

Fields of Study

  • Economics

Readers

  • Government and Public Administration Law.
  • Industrial Economics
  • Naval Personnel Management